(no subject)
Feb. 8th, 2014 12:03 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
A propos of nothing, do both parents have to sign a baby's birth certificate? I'm just wondering because what if the parents are estranged by the time the kid is born and the father's not around, can the mother put him on the birth certificate anyway, or does he need to sign? I wonder about the weirdest things sometimes. I blame my commute. Packed in like a sardine with nothing to do but think, because it's often too crowded for me to take out my phone and google the answer to whatever question I'm wondering about. Plus, I do have a data plan, but it's not limitless. This is why I should listen to music more often on my commute. Turn off the old trivia brain.
I have a cold. Icky.
I have a cold. Icky.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 12:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 01:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 12:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 12:58 am (UTC)First of all, it's totally a state-by-state/country-by-country thing: everywhere has their own particular set of laws about it.
But in Alaska in the 1970s (when/where I was born), if the parents were married, then the husband's name would automatically go on the birth certificate as the father. If the parents were not married, as was the case with mine, then the mother could not put the father's name on the certificate without a court order. Somewhat later in the decade, this was relaxed to allow the father's name to be added as long as there was a signed affidavit from both parents confirming paternity. So there's no father on my original birth cert., but there is some "legitimization" paperwork confirming a) my father's identity, and b) my "new" legal name with his surname (technically the same as my old name since they always planned to do this, but whatever), and then a new birth certificate with the father's name. I assume the idea was to prevent false paternity suits, so a woman couldn't just name the father as so & so without paperwork being filed. I would also assume (or, well, hope) that rules are more relaxed and flexible nowadays, but that's how it used to be.
THIS IS PROBABLY MORE INFORMATION THAN YOU WANTED.
no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 01:16 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 01:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-02-09 01:22 am (UTC)